In one camp are the book enthusiasts, who cited difficulty with screen back lighting, reading small text, and the smell and feel of real paper as the reasons why they prefer to stick to lugging around textbooks.
Among the opposition are several hanging on Apple's every word until tomorrow when they unveil their new tablet computer.
Personally, I get the whole lighting thing. To draw in a pertinent analogy, I live in a 4 ft. by 4 ft. cement box known as a dorm room, and not once have I turned on the fluorescent lighting. I prefer softer lamp light because it's easier on my eyes. And as far as the smell and feel of books go, I keep several copies of my favorite classic novels on bookshelves (among them, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald).
So I (yes, me, the tech-under enthusiast) propose a wonderfully harmonious common ground--the Amazon Kindle. Why?
- No lugging around textbooks. It serves up the small, compact portability of a paperback.
- The adeptly placed page turn buttons and lack of back light mock the feel of a book. Okay, so for the paper-sniffers this doesn't add much appeal, but closer to the real thing then the Apple tablet. And that whole "feeling" argument isn't working out too well for the newspaper industry, either.
- It's a book reader. Not a fancy tablet computer. The focus lies more so in the literature then the variety of things the tablet plans on doing (music, movies, Internet).
And for the kicker, read: Technologically illiterate person willingly operates e-reader. Shouldn't that be reason enough to believe?

